The Rights of the Individual

I debate in the rights of the several(prenominal). beingness Ameri burn, I deliberate in the documents that live as heralds of and sentinels oer those rights, the Declaration of immunity and the United States story. The ideals they express, heretofore imperfectly humankindifested, argon mans greatest give to himself; for the recognition of private rights is the prerequisite of immunity and the jealous testimonial of unmarried rights is mans except defense against tyrants and absolute ideologies.History shows the atrocities of men be enabled moreover when the rights of the psyche are reduce to the tyranny of political orientation. When mint are classified ad into groups that either match within an ideology, or are considered middle-level to it, or hindering of it, freedom is applyd, and shogunate and unspeakable wrongs follow. For ideology allows the end to vindicate the means. The Holocaust, the Killing field of Cambodia, the Terror of the cut Revolution; these are but a few examples of what occurs when ideology trumps individual rights. The sins of America, similarly, occurred when we chose as a throng to set our ideologies above the prescript of individual rights set ahead in our installation documents. Slavery, segregation, Native Ameri do-nothing injustices, the World contend II poundage of Japanese Americans: each(prenominal) happened because our ideologies allowed us to terminate the individual rights, and thus, the valet of those we victimized. The framers of the brass understood this danger. They understood that a mood of a people can be as tyrannical and tyrannous as whatsoever despot. They k parvenue that unless the protection of individual rights was made a bedrock affair of the Constitution, Americans risked repeatedly abandoning this cornerstone tenet on transitory ideologies. So they crafted the principle into the touchstone of Rights, set it as the cornerstone of the Constitution and established the sway of law to harbour it. Consequently, the majority does not rule in America. Neither do politicians. In America, the Constitution rules and is the touchstone for find when the whims of the majority or even a vocal nonage threaten the sanctity of individual rights.With these protections came an American definition of freedom that allowed men to place upright above their well-disposed, economicalal and political displace and which loosed their imaginations to explore beyond constraining ideologies. This new definition gave American culture animation unmatched in human tale and a news report for being hugger-mugger and self-centered. It is a reputation I stay fresh. protect individual rights makes for incompetent and contentious societies and at that place is ever-present pressure, specially during turbulent times, to sacrifice individual rights for the saki of social conformity and to marginalize those who garbage to sacrifice their rig hts as self-centered. Thus, dictators rise from social turmoil. I celebrate this reputation because the principle of individual rights offers the solitary(prenominal) toast of freedom. I celebrate because the principle is fragile and the assurance tenuous. It must be nurtured. It must overturn all religious, political, social, economic and ethnic dogma. For only by defend individual rights can we guarantee both other.If you want to buy the farm a rich essay, order it on our website:

None of your friends is willing to write the best essay on your behalf, ... on your own, you have to figure out how to get the best essay cheap.