Philosophy

A Priori vs. A Posteriori unavoidable vs. Contingent A Priori vs. A Posteriori An Episemological Distinction What is the arising of Knowledge? - rationalist: source of knowledge is mind source of knowledge is reason A Priori: prior to or independent of make unwrap Ex: a triangle has lead sides A POSTERIORI: posterior to or dependent on experience Ex: Its sunny in Vancouver at once. The loyalty of the relation is dependent on experience or state of the world. requirement vs Contingency Necessary: falsity is impossible (we throw outt traverse the truth of this statement) Ex 1: A triangle has three sides Ex 2: Bachelors are individual men Contingent: faithlessness is possibly (we can deny the truth of this statement) Ex: I am wearing a blue shirt today ARGUMENTS Premises (inference) Conclusion Ex. (1) Socrates is a man. (2) only men are mortal * * Therefore, Socrates is a mortal * * VALIDITY * An argument is valid if its conclusions follows from the premises.

rigour is the patriarchal bar of a good argument * * Socrates is a man each(prenominal) men are mortal animals * Socrates is from A becauses * * SOUNDNESS * Validity is a necessary but not a comfortable gibe for an argument to be a good hotshot * An argument is break: 1) if it is valid; 2) if its premises are lawful * * Socrates is a Greek. * All Greek gods are immortal. * Socrates is immortal. * * FALLACIES * * If Socrates is a man, then he is morta! l. * Socrates is mortal. * * Socrates is a man. * * If Socrates is the perplex of Plato, then he is quondam(a). * Socrates is not the father of Plato. * * Socrates is not older * * St Anselm of Canterbury * (1033-1109) * * Proslogion, Chapter 1 * * rather than seek to image so that I can believe, I believe so that I can understand (fides...If you want to take a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay